The revelation made by the well-known social media influencer, Daniel Regha, sheds light on the intriguing aspect of Mohbad's decision regarding his properties and his father's subsequent actions. Continue reading
In a recent post, Daniel Regha disclosed the rationale behind Mohbad's choice not to acquire properties in his father's name. This disclosure adds a layer of complexity to the situation, hinting at underlying motives or personal dynamics within Mohbad's family.
Moreover, Daniel Regha expressed deep concern over the way Mohbad's father has been prioritizing the acquisition of properties over seeking justice for Mohbad. According to Regha, this behavior raises significant red flags.
The fact that Mohbad's father is more focused on material possessions rather than addressing the circumstances surrounding Mohbad's situation suggests potential ulterior motives or a skewed set of priorities. It implies that there might be more to the story than meets the eye, prompting questions about the father's true intentions and concerns for his son's well-being.
I believe Mohbad's decision to keep properties out of his father's name and not designate him as the next of kin likely reflected a specific intention or, possibly, a strained relationship between them.
However, since Mohbad's passing, I've observed that his father's primary focus has been on acquiring Mohbad's properties, rather than seeking justice for his loss. This shift in priorities is a significant red flag, suggesting potential ulterior motives or a lack of genuine concern for Mohbad's well-being.
Moreover, the attempt to disinherit Mohbad's son, presumably the rightful heir, seems like a heartless act. It raises questions about whether this action is motivated by greed or malice, rather than a consideration for Mohbad's legacy and the welfare of his surviving family members.
In such a tragic time, the family's primary concern should be supporting one another, pursuing justice for Mohbad, and ensuring the well-being of the deceased's dependents.
In this situation, the fixation on properties is not only ethically questionable but also diverts attention away from more pressing matters, such as honoring Mohbad's memory, providing emotional support to the grieving family, and seeking justice for his untimely demise.
